понедельник, 26 марта 2012 г.

Cigarette lighter with built-in stun gun is great for self-defense

lighter for your cigarettes

If you have been following our website for a while now, you might recall that sometime last year we reported on a Zippo lighter that got transformed into a gun, and if you’re a fan of novel inventions like that, you might be interested to check out this particular cigarette lighter that has a stun gun built into it, ultimately pulling double duty as a lighter for your cigarettes and at the same time offering a form of self defense.

While the cigarette lighter is nothing to shout about, the stun gun might be worth taking a look at. It has the capability to output 260KV and is powered by a integrated NiCad rechargeable battery, a body built from ABS engineering plastic and features a charging time of 10 hours. As icing on the cake, the cigarette lighter/stun gun will also pack a LED flashlight, just in case you need a clearer look at the guy your electrocuting. Jokes aside, this cigarette lighter/stun gun/LED flashlight is available from Focal Price for $20.39, and needless to say that you should be extremely careful with if it you plan on buying one for yourself.

Cigarette smokers pay more than MRP

as cigarette prices

The statutory warning on the box says ‘Smoking kills; tobacco causes cancer’. But it is now turning detrimental for your wealth, too, as cigarette prices have increased 9-12 per cent in the past week.

For instance, a pack of 20 Classic branded cigarettes (from ITC) now costs Rs 120. The increase in this case has been nine per cent or Rs 10 per packet.
Similarly, retailers are selling a 10-stick pack of Navy Cut cigarettes (also from ITC) for Rs 48-50 instead of Rs 44. However, the maximum retail prices printed on these packets have not changed so far as cigarette makers are yet to formally announce a price rise.
"The stockists have already increased the price. We have no option but to charge a higher price," said a retailer.

Industry players said the rise in prices is in anticipation of higher ad valorem duty on cigarettes with a length of over 65 millimetre (mm). Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in his Budget speech on March 16, had proposed introduction of an ad valorem duty of 10 per cent on these cigarettes.

While cigarette makers may not have formally raised the prices yet, they are believed to have indicated the rate of increase to stockists. Hence, cigarette prices have surged already. Analysts said this gave the wholesalers an opportunity to gain more on existing stocks that were purchased at old prices.

An ITC spokesperson said the company does not comment on its future pricing strategies. ITC manufactures three out of every four cigarettes sold in India.

Most of the retailers said the price rise has been across all segments of cigarettes, a claim that could not be immediately verified by Business Standard independently.

In India, currently, cigarettes of 65 mm, 73 mm, 83 or 84 mm, 93 mm and 100 mm length are available.

According to industry analysts, due to the ad valorem duty, cigarette makers may consider reviving the below 65 mm segment where the tax burden has not increased.

An ad valorem duty, which was abolished in 1987, is based on the sale value of the product. Market experts argue it does not allow a uniform tax structure. In a specific duty structure, on the other hand, the tax is imposed on the product regardless of its sale price.

The cost of cigarettes will go up in Romania

cost of cigarettes

The cost of cigarettes will go up starting with July 1 with the increase of the excise tax from EUR 76.6 per 1,000 cigarettes to EUR 79.19 per 1,000 cigarettes.

A pack of cigarettes will cost more with 15-20 bani starting with July 1

Data published by the Romania's National Institute of Statistics shows that the price of tobacco and cigarettes has gone up by 6.5 percent last year. The value of the legal cigarette market was over EUR 3.3 billion.

Indian girl trapped in life of cigarette rolling

cigarettes on rooftops

Sagira Ansari sits on a dusty sack outside her uneven brick home in this poor town in eastern India, her legs folded beneath her. She cracks her knuckles, then rubs charcoal ash between her palms.
With the unthinking swiftness of a movement performed countless times before, she slashes a naked razor blade into a square-cut leaf to trim off the veins. She drops in flakes of tobacco, packs them with her thumbs, rolls the leaf tightly between her fingers and ties it off with two twists of a red thread.

For eight hours a day, Sagira makes bidis — thin brown cigarettes that are as central to Indian life as chai and flat bread.

She is 11 years old.

Sagira is among hundreds of thousands of children toiling in the hidden corners of rural India. Many work in hazardous industries crucial to the economy: the fiery brick kilns that underpin the building industry, the pesticide-laden fields that produce its food.

Most of the children in Sagira's town of Dhuliyan in West Bengal state work in the tobacco dust to feed India's near limitless demand for bidis.

Under Indian law, this is legal.

Sagira, who has deep brown eyes and a wide smile, joined her family's bidi work when she was seven. At first she just rolled out thread for her older sisters and brother, then she helped finish off the cigarettes, pushing down the open ends. Last year, she graduated to full-scale rolling.

She is not alone. Her best friend, Amira, also rolls bidis. So do Wasima and Jaminoor and the rest of the girls in a neighborhood that is, at its heart, a giant, open-air bidi factory.

Parents and children roll cigarettes on rooftops, in the alleyways, by the roads. One woman draped in a red shawl in the yard behind Sagira's house breast feeds her baby while rolling. Of the roughly 20,000 families in Dhuliyan, an estimated 95 percent roll bidis to survive.

Sagira is expert enough that even when distracted, her fingers continue to flit blindly through the tobacco shavings in front of her.

She says the work can make her ill, with a cold, a cough, a fever. Her head often aches. So do her fingers.

Sometimes, she takes her woven basket of tendu leaves and tobacco to the banks of the Ganges to roll in a circle with her friends. She stops every so often to splash in the river for a few moments. Then she gets back to work.

"I can't play around," she laments.

___

Manu Seikh, the bidi king of Sagira's neighborhood, sits on a roadside bench. In front of him lie orderly stacks of rupee bills — tens, fifties, hundreds — large bags filled with one- and two-rupee coins and a small box holding his asthma inhaler.

He and thousands of middlemen like him are the linchpins that provide the veneer of legality to the bidi industry, insulating the powerful companies selling bidis from the families and children rolling them.

Seikh, 66, got his start in a bidi factory when he was 16, back when bidis were rolled on the factory floor.

A 1986 law barred children under 14 from working with bidis and other hazardous industries, but left a huge loophole that allowed children to assist their families with work performed at home.

So now, while the tobacco is threshed, cut and blended in factories, it is then given to Seikh and other middlemen to distribute to families for rolling. The bidis are then brought back to the factory for roasting, packaging and shipping. A pack of 10 to 12 will retail for 6 rupees, or 12 cents.

The informal nature of the work makes it nearly impossible to count how many of India's 7 million bidi rollers are children, but estimates range from 250,000 to 1 million.

Every noon, adults and children carry baskets and tubs filled with bundles of bidis to Seikh's corner stall, where his men scan them for quality, reject those deemed substandard and stack the others in shallow wooden boxes. A bookkeeper makes a note in a ledger and hands over a chit for payment.

Then the rollers receive more tobacco and tendu leaves for another day's work.

Seikh blames poverty for forcing the children to work, and the government for failing to stop it.

"I am very concerned about children not going to school and losing their futures. But we are helpless," Seikh says.

In his nearby factory, Ranjan Choudhary, 37, also distances himself from blame, even as boys aged about 7 or 8 slide bidis into plastic pouches and seal them on a small stove.

Whatever the child labor laws say, he sees the industry as "a lifeline" for the people.

"It affects children, but for them to survive, this is the only industry here. There is no other source of income," he said.

The industry's chief trade group also brushed off responsibility.

"The child has every right to help the mother. As long as we don't recruit the children to roll bidis, I don't think we violate any act," said Umesh Parekh, chief executive of the All India Bidi Industry Federation.

Bidi rollers should "themselves exercise restraint" in using children, he said, adding that his trade group had no plans to fight against child labor.

"The industry is not doing anything for that. It is for the government to do," he said.

The government is reevaluating its child labor policy, said Mrutyunjay Sarangi, India's labor secretary, but had yet to decide on any concrete action.

"We are having discussions," he said.

India has tacitly recognized this Dickensian nightmare with a recent law making education compulsory up to age 14, said Bhavna Mukhopadhya of the Voluntary Health Association of India, an aid group. "Everything has a time, and I think this is the right time to do it ... you have to ban child labor across the board, strictly," she said.

But efforts to change the labor laws are complicated by the bidi industry's clout in government. One company owner even sits in the national Cabinet.

E-Cigarettes are Here to Stay

e-cig users

Until recently, e-cigs have been sold through traditional tobacco stores that normally expect a keystone or 100% markup on items other than cigarettes. Though it is hard to determine the number of e-cig users in the U.S., the National Vapers Club estimated that about a million people used e-cigs last year, so it certainly is a growing segment, and the product offers c-stores an excellent alternative to cigarettes with lower taxes and much higher margins.

“In 2010 there were 750,000 units sold and that jumped to 2.5 million sold in 2011, and the market is expected to quadruple by end of 2013 to early to mid of 2014,” said Thomas Kiklas, co-founder of the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association.

Close to 20 million cartridges are sold in the U.S. on a weekly basis and about 10 million disposables weekly, Kiklas said.

Both disposable and rechargeable packages have distinct markets. Disposables tend to sell best in gas stations and convenience stores where people come in and out quickly, while rechargeables are selling strongly in tobacco stores where customers have time to learn about the technology.

“There is still some skepticism on the part of the consumer and the retailer based on whether or not the FDA will get involved to a greater degree,” said Stephen Monaco, director of purchasing for Tedeschi Food Shops in Rockland, Mass.

Regulation Issues
Last April, the FDA announced its plans to regulate e-cigarettes as tobacco products and will work with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to tax and regulate distribution, which means e-cigarette importers must have tobacco importing licenses, and sellers must have tobacco licenses in all 50 states.

States are still figuring out how to deal with e-cigarettes. In Hawaii, for example, the product was up against a proposal that aimed to tax e-cigarettes at 70% of the wholesale price. Luckily for Hawaiian retailers, the bill was not passed.

“We have no problem with the taxing of the product, but you have to tax it at the level of harm that it does, and it’s a less harmful product than a traditional tobacco cigarette,” Kiklas said. “So if you’re going to tax it, tax it at that level, and that level would be not very high.”

Just last month, e-cigarettes made the national news when a device blew up in a Florida man’s mouth, leading some to question the safety of the devices.

“We are waiting for the Florida authorities to come to a determination on what brand and what product the gentleman was using because it’s our understanding that he was using something called a MOD—that’s a modified product where they take batteries and they really juice up a unit to really where it’s no longer an e-cig,” Kiklas said. “We do not recognize MODs as electronic cigarettes.”

Kiklas compared turning an e-cig into a MOD with taking a normal gas lawnmower and adding a turbo charger and nitrous oxide, in other words, an improper, unsafe way to modify a product.

“What some people are doing in the market is they’re modifying e-cigarettes to generate a lot more vapor than they were initially intended for, and we think that’s what the gentleman in Florida was using when he had the anomaly,” Kiklas said.

To keep things in perspective, Kiklas added, out of the more than 2.5 million units sold last year and the billions of e-cigarettes used in the last two years, “there has never been an anomaly like what happened in Florida ever, so let’s wait until authorities learn what actually happened,” he said.

Group protests E-cigarette ban

protests E-cigarette

A small but vocal group of Utahans say they have been unfairly targeted by lawmakers. They smoke electronic cigarettes…a smoke-free smoking alternative and now, thanks to House Bill 245 and a signature from the governor, E-cigs will soon be banned in public places, just like regular cigarettes.
E-cigarettes transfer flavors and nicotine into the lungs through water vapor rather than smoke. Rep. Bradley, R-Hurricane, sponsored the ban bill. He says they may be safer, but they may not be safe.
“As it stands right now, if someone wanted to come to one of our committee meetings and start using an E-cigarette we really wouldn’t have anything to say because E-cigarettes don’t come under the definition of smoking in our Utah Clean Indoor Air Act,” said Bradley during this year’s legislative session.
The Food and Drug Administration did a preliminary study of E-cigs and found a cartridge containing di-ethylene glycol, considered toxic to humans. They also found they couldn’t rely on the amount of nicotine delivered by any given brand. Some had levels twice what the FDA recommends for smoking cessation products.
On the floor of the state House, Rep. Brian Doughty, D-Salt Lake City, tried to amend the bill. He wanted to OK E-cigs and hookahs in certain businesses.
“Banning the use of hookahs and E-cigs in establishments where adults have chosen to give their business is still the heavy hand of the government affecting small businesses in Utah,” Doughty said.

четверг, 15 марта 2012 г.

Anti-smoking efforts save 800,000 U.S.

Anti-smoking efforts

Higher taxes on cigarettes, limits on selling to kids and campaigns to educate people on the dangers of smoking have saved nearly 800,000 lives, according to a U.S. study released Wednesday.

The research is based on scientific models that counted how many people smoked up until 1970 and projected how many would have died of lung cancer between 1975 and 2000 if not for a concerted U.S. effort to cut back.

"This is the first attempt to quantify the impact of changes in smoking behaviors on lung cancer mortality based on detailed reconstruction of cigarette smoking histories," said lead author Suresh Moolgavkar of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

"The methods that were developed as a part of this research should prove to be invaluable to other researchers investigating the adverse health impacts of cigarette smoking."

If everyone had quit smoking after the Surgeon General's 1964 report that first warned of the hazards of cigarettes, 2.5 million lung cancer deaths could have been avoided, said the study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

But since that did not happen, of course, there were more than two million deaths among men from lung cancer and more than a million among women from 1975 to 2000.

Tobacco control efforts averted 550,000 lung cancer deaths among men and 240,000 among women during that span, said the study, funded by the National Cancer Institute.

The study only extended to 2000 because the researchers lacked detailed data for subsequent years at the time when the study first began, the study authors said.

However, more can be done, said co-author Eric Feuer, chief of the National Cancer Institute's Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch.

"An overwhelming majority of lung cancer deaths can be prevented by eliminating cigarette smoking," said Feuer.

"The progress that has been made by tobacco control programs and policies in reducing lung cancer deaths represents about a third of the progress that could have been made if all cigarette smoking had ceased in 1965."

A total of 20.6 percent of the U.S. population currently smokes, including nearly four million youths, according to the latest government data.

CDC launching graphic anti-smoking ad campaign

anti-smoking ad campaign

Tobacco taxes and smoking bans haven't budged the U.S. smoking rate in years. Now the government is trying to shock smokers into quitting with a graphic nationwide advertising campaign.
The billboards and print, radio and TV ads show people whose smoking resulted in heart surgery, a tracheotomy, lost limbs or paralysis. The $54 million campaign is the largest and starkest anti-smoking push...

Hypnotist helps to stub out smoking habits

stub out smoking

A Biddulph based dentist has joined forces with a clinical hypnotherapist to help his patients quit smoking.

Dr Richard Armishaw, of Synergy Dental Care, Tunstall Road, Biddulph, wants to raise awareness of side effects of smoking that damage the teeth and mouth, including bad breath, gum disease, tooth loss and oral cancer.
He said: “People come to us to get rid of the black marks on their teeth, but they dont realise the major damage that they have done to what’s underneath”

The practice is offering sessions with hypnotherapist Rosemarie Wakeman, who say she creates a pathway to take people’s minds away from smoking.

The two hour sessions are designed to change the smoker’s attitude to lighting up in the hope that they will eventually quit.

Prominent Berkeley marijuana dispensary to close shop

Berkeley marijuana dispensary

One of California’s biggest medical marijuana establishments – embraced by local officials as a model business that donates to the poor and pays millions in taxes – has become the latest target in a statewide crackdown by federal prosecutors.

Berkeley Patients Group, founded in 1999 by leading names in the state’s medical marijuana movement, will cease operations at its current location later this year, according to an agreement between the dispensary’s owners and the landlord. The document was signed on Feb. 28 by Alameda County Superior Court Judge C. Don Clay.

“Berkeley Patients Group agrees to cease all cannabis-related activities and remove all cannabis-related property from the premises by May 1, 2012,” the document states. Legal experts said agreements of this kind can be revised, but it was unclear if that was possible in this case.

The decision to shutter the outlet on San Pablo Avenue was triggered by a warning from Melinda Haag, the U.S. attorney for Northern California. In a letter sent to the owner of the building that houses the dispensary, Haag said federal prosecutors would file a forfeiture action if marijuana continued to be distributed at the location. Berkeley Patients Group has leased the property since 1999 and operates under a city license.

The letter cited violations of federal law and the fact that the outlet is within 1,000 feet of two schools: the Center for Early Intervention on Deafness, which also houses a preschool, and Ecole Bilingue de Berkeley, a French bilingual grade school.

“Marijuana dispensaries are full of cash and they’re full of marijuana, and everybody knows that," Haag said in an interview. "They are at risk of being robbed, and many of them are robbed.”

While marijuana is illegal under federal law, Haag said she doesn’t have the resources to target all the medical pot outlets that have proliferated in her district in recent years. So, she said, her office is focusing on protecting children.

“When a dispensary comes to my attention that is close to a school, a park or a playground or to children, that's a line I've decided to draw, and those are the dispensaries that I’m looking at,” Haag said.

Since federal prosecutors announced a statewide crackdown in October, Haag said her office has sent letters to a number of dispensaries, including Berkeley Patients Group and an outlet in Santa Cruz that was robbed by armed gunmen in February. The outlet is next to a preschool.

“People in the community may be supportive of the dispensary," Haag said, "until there’s an armed robbery and people come running out of the dispensary shooting guns."

Berkeley Patients Group’s owners declined interview requests, but supporters said the outlet has never been the scene of violence or an armed robbery. The group issued a statement reading: “BPG remains committed to providing safe and affordable access to its patient-members, while working to preserve the jobs of its 70+ employees. We are grateful for the level of support we have received from the Berkeley community over the years.”

среда, 7 марта 2012 г.

Humble says no to smoking in public



It's now illegal to smoke in public areas in the city of Humble.

The Humble City Council recently voted 5-1 to enact a city ordinance that bans smoking in public areas.

The ordinance, which went into effect March 1, imposes a maximum fine of $2,000 to businesses and individuals who violate the ordinance.

Health issue

Humble City Manager Darrell Boeske said enacting the ban was a public health issue, and one that city leaders should take seriously.

"I am not against a person being able to smoke, but by the same token I don't know why you would subject people who don't smoke to that health hazard, especially children," Boeske said. "Smoking is a detriment to health and really annoying to people who don't smoke."

Ordinance basics

The new ordinance outlined a number of establishments where smoking is banned, including: all restaurants, pool or billiard halls, gaming halls and bingo parlors, movie theaters, auditoriums, shopping malls, educational offices, child care facilities, some bars, and enclosed and open air sporting arenas.

There are exceptions to the ban that include homes, tobacco outlets and stores, and bars in operation before March 1.

Common trend

Boeske added that larger cities, such as Dallas, Austin and San Antonio had enacted similar ordinances, and that a smoking ban was hardly a new concept to anyone.

"We didn't jump in here the first day. We are last to get on the bandwagon," he said.

Boeske said many of the larger chain restaurants have placed a ban on smoking in those establishments, but that a lot of the smaller local restaurants have trouble telling customers, smoking is not allowed.

"This is just a way to help them," he said.

Councilman Bill Connor, the lone dissenter on the council, said he opposed the smoking ban because it takes the control of the smoking issue out of the hands of the business owner, and puts in into the hands of the government.

"I don't like anything that takes people's rights away," he said. "If we got to sit here and control what people do, well that's not what government is for. It's supposed to be for the people, not against the people."

Connor, who owns a business in Humble, said he has had people come into his business over the years, and has never had a problem asking people not to smoke.

"None of these businesses have a problem (asking people not to smoke)," Connor said.

However, Connor said some businesses are afraid to enforce a ban on smoking for fear of losing their customers.

"They are shuffling the blame on us," Connor said.

Meanwhile, in a memorandum addressed to the city council, Connor explained why the city doesn't need another ordinance.

"We currently have ordinances we are not enforcing. Why add another one? Especially one that encumbers the rights of the business owner," Conner said in his memorandum. "The right to smoke or not smoke should be left up to the business owner and not the city of Humble."

Wayne Falgiano, who owns and operates the Railroad Café in Humble, has never allowed smoking and is happy to see the ordinance pass.

"Cigarette smoke is pretty nasty stuff," Falgiano said. "It stays in the air a long time. I don't recommend smoking in a restaurant at all."

Let counties set their own smoking ban restrictions

own smoking ban

Chances are good this week that some form of statewide smoking ban will emerge from the Indiana Statehouse.

Legislators from the House and Senate began negotiations Monday on a compromise over proposed smoking restrictions. This, after the House passed a bill restricting smoking in workplaces and nearly all other public places and business; after 18 months it would include bars as well. The Senate passed a version carving out many more exemptions, such as for bingo halls, nursing homes -- and no ban for bars. More importantly, the Senate bill includes a provision that would block any new local smoking ordinances.

No matter what happens, it's likely Delaware County's smoking ban that includes businesses, bars and taverns would remain in place. But it could prevent other counties from enacting tougher bans.

Rep. Eric Turner, R- Cicero, who is leading the House-Senate conference committee, said he would not support any measure that would block new local smoking ordinances.

"I don't want to go down that path of trying to trump what locals have successfully done for a number of years," Turner said.

State Sen. Beverly Gard, R-Greenfield, believes it's important to protect the right of cities and towns to adopt tougher rules than whatever becomes state law.

So do we.

And here's another reason: With East Central Indiana counties having the highest lung cancer rates in the state (84.6 cases for every 100,000 residents) and smoking rates that trump the state average (23 percent smoke vs. 20 percent statewide), it's imperative local governments have the necessary tools to take action on behalf of the public's health and welfare.

That means local governments, whether in ECI or elsewhere in the state, need to have reserved for them the power to ban smoking as they see fit.

The Statehouse has seen a dearth of common sense in this short session. Let's hope that members of the conference committee can hammer together a smoking ban that allows counties and towns to enact their own ban, as well as come up with a bill that has fewer exemptions. To do anything less would endanger the public's health and go against the tide of clamping down on smoking.

As we've editorialized before, a level playing field for business and health -- where one locale cannot gain at the expense of another -- is the ideal.

The state's health would benefit best from a bill that contains few exemptions, and allows local government to enact tougher bans.

Gov. Mitch Daniels said he hopes the version of the smoking ban will be a strong one. We just hope it protects home rule.

Fewer premature births after smoking ban in Scotland

smoking ban in Scotland

Since Scotland introduced a ban on smoking in public places in 2006 there has been a 10% drop in the country's premature birth rate, say researchers.

They believe this is a smoke-free benefit that can be chalked up alongside others, like reductions in heart disease and childhood asthma.

Tobacco smoke has been linked to poor foetal growth and placenta problems.

Plos Medicine analysed smoking and birth rates for all expectant women in Scotland before and after the ban.

It included data for more than 700,000 women spanning a period of about 14 years.

Significant change
Scotland was the first country in the UK to ban smoking in public places, followed by Wales, Northern Ireland and England in 2007.

After the legislation was introduced in Scotland, fewer mothers-to-be smoked - 19% compared with 25% before.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

It is important to remember that the reasons a baby can be born premature or underweight are complicated and that smoking is just one risk factor”

Andy Cole
Chief Executive of Bliss
At the same time there was a significant drop in the number of babies born prematurely or with low birthweight.

The investigators believe both are linked to the smoking ban, even though these rates started to go down some months before the ban was introduced and smoking incidence started to creep up again shortly after the ban.

They say there have not been any major changes in maternity care that would explain the findings.

Also, the reduction in premature births was both in non-smokers and women who continued to smoke when pregnant, which they say suggests passive smoke exposure is likely involved.

But while their work suggests a link, it is not proof that one thing necessarily causes another. As with all retrospective studies like this, it is impossible to rule out entirely all other factors that might have influenced the finding.

However, Dr Daniel Mackay and colleagues from the University of Glasgow say their findings "add to the growing evidence of the wide-ranging health benefits of smoke-free legislation" and "lend support" to the adoption of such legislation in countries where it does not currently exist.

Andy Cole, chief executive of the special care baby charity Bliss, said: "We welcome the findings of this new study, which highlights a reduction in the number of babies born early or with low birthweight in Scotland, where around 8,000 babies are born each year needing specialist hospital care.

"Bliss always recommends that women should not smoke during pregnancy and that they should lead a healthy lifestyle. However, it is important to remember that the reasons a baby can be born premature or underweight are complicated and that smoking is just one risk factor."

According to the British Heart Foundation, there are more than nine million smokers in the UK, and smoking remains the UK's biggest cause of avoidable early death.

It says the focus should now shift to the effect of smoking in the home and confined spaces, such as cars, especially where children are present.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are continuing to build upon the achievements made to protect future generations from the devastating effects of smoking such as bans on cigarette vending machines and the displays in shops.

"We are committed to ensuring a new comprehensive robust tobacco control strategy for Scotland is developed this year. This strategy will focus on prevention and cessation and include ambitious targets for reducing smoking across Scotland."

Smoking in public places ban reaps health benefits

Smoking in public places

"Yes, please," says the woman's speech bubble, oblivious to the smaller "No thanks" speech bubble emanating from her bump. Of course, unborn babies do not have a choice in the matter if their mothers choose to continue puffing through pregnancy, despite the known risks.

Moking among pregnant women and mothers is thought to account for around half of all cot deaths in Scotland and a quarter of miscarriages and still births, as well as reduced birthweights and more preterm deliveries. Yet it remains more common in Scotland than England, especially in Glasgow and among teenage mums.

A common response to questions from health professionals is: "My mum smoked when she was expecting me and I turned out fine." It is hard to change behaviour that is so culturally ingrained, especially when friends and family are heavy smokers. It may take literally generations. At best public policy can nudge citizens in the right direction. So we should welcome a study published today from Professor Jill Pell of Glasgow University that suggests the 2006 Scottish ban on smoking in public places has resulted in a reduction in the number of preterm births and low birthweight babies. In view of the increased risk of such babies developing long-term health problems, any reduction in those figures is highly desirable.

This is a major study. It considers all single births, nearly three-quarters of a million, between 1996 and 2009. The results imply that the publicity surrounding the ban about the risks of smoking and the increased support for smoking cessation may have been as important as the ban itself. The percentage of mothers smoking while pregnant fell from more than 25% to less than 19%.

Equally significant perhaps is the recently reported drop in children being admitted to hospital with breathing difficulties such as asthma. That suggests parents have not simply swopped smoking in public places for lighting up in their own living rooms, as some opponents of the ban predicted.

There is still a long furrow to plough on this issue. Nearly two-thirds of teenage mums in Scotland continue to smoke during pregnancy, as do one in four pregnant women in Glasgow, where 600 women are being recruited for a trial to see if offering £400 of supermarket vouchers can help stiffen their resolve to quit the habit. It may smack of desperation but if far more women stop smoking and stay stopped with the incentive than without it, public policy will have given a big nudge in the right direction and the scheme should be adopted more generally.

The argument about drinking in pregnancy is more complex but that too constitutes an avoidable risk to unborn children, bolstering the case for minimum alcohol pricing. It is tragic that having got rid of polio and diphtheria, the big childhood killers of the past, avoidable causes of child harm and death persist in the 21st century.